Sitemap

Member-only story

The 3 Design Patterns That Quietly Fixed 80% of Our Tech Debt

3 min readJun 14, 2025

--

When abstraction isn’t the enemy, it’s the solution.

We didn’t plan on fixing our tech debt with design patterns. We just needed to ship faster without making things worse. What followed was a quiet revolution. Over the course of six months, three design patterns — introduced almost subconsciously — helped us clean up layers of brittle logic, fix broken abstractions, and finally stop the cascade of bugs every time we touched core systems.

Let’s walk through the three patterns that quietly did 80% of the cleanup.

1. Strategy Pattern — Killing If-Else Chaos

Problem: Our code was drowning in if-else branches and switch-case statements. Business rules were deeply embedded and brittle. Every change risked regression.

What We Replaced:

// before
if user.Type == "Free" {
sendLimitedReport()
} else if user.Type == "Premium" {
sendFullReport()
} else if user.Type == "Enterprise" {
sendCustomReport()
}

After Applying Strategy:

type ReportSender interface {
SendReport(user User)
}

func GetReportSender(user User) ReportSender {
switch user.Type {
case "Free": return FreeReport{}
case "Premium": return PremiumReport{}
case "Enterprise": return EnterpriseReport{}
default: return NoOpReport{}
}
}

// Usage
type := GetReportSender(user)
type.SendReport(user)

--

--

CaffeinatedCoder
CaffeinatedCoder

Written by CaffeinatedCoder

I write code, drink coffee, and sometimes regret both. Exploring the chaos of modern software, one post at a time.